|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shawna Gray
Gallente
   |
Posted - 2010.08.15 18:57:00 -
[1]
Good idea. We need more bots and more empire alts for iskfarming.
|
Shawna Gray
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 19:37:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: sentinel22uk
People are talking about how this would be negative for solo pvp ? Please how ? Simply removing local would make it easier to kill and easier to *be* killed = a more fun eve.
+2
It would make empire isk-generating alts even better than they already are. Especially for the ones that dont use bots.(In other words your targets go away). Your traveltime slows because of scanning.
|
Shawna Gray
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 22:01:00 -
[3]
Originally by: sentinel22uk
You enter a system and everybody immediately safes up/cloaks/docks, do you have any idea how much time and effort it takes to kill one person solo anymore ?
Does it matter? 0.0 is hardly balanced around solopvp.
Quote:
A simple delayed local in null sec would solve every problem every person who wants to fight faces, and in turn would send prices of 0.0 gained materials sky high.
IMO every person who lives in 0.0 to PvP would enjoy this, if you want to be in a safe heaven stay in highsec, don't come to 0.0 to mine arkonor and expect to be safe.
You didnt think this through.
Quote:
EDIT: Plus people are talking about a delayed local making it impossible to rat in lowsec... Why ? Nobody would know you were there, they would only see your ship on D-scan ( within 14.4AU of course ).
Its not much effort to scan through belts.
Quote:
If you want to reap the profits of 0.0 and the meager profits of lowsec, people should learn to live in these environments and adapt their techniques. For example, instead of using that big hefty dominix to kill belt rats, use a nano-fast align shield tanked battlecruiser/hac and warp as soon as you see anything on d-scan within 1-4 AU.
Why bother when your empire alt can run missions, trade and do invention etc instead. The utter stupidity of spamming d-scan every 2 seconds is certainly more than enough to keep me away from any belts.
Quote:
If you get caught by a instalocking stealth bomber de-cloak, then fair game.
Cloaks would be nerfed soon after local disappears.
0.0 is already more of a battleground than a place where you live. CCP is actually trying to encourage more characters to move out there, not less.
|
Shawna Gray
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 22:12:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Gneeznow
I'm sure it'll happen CCP always listen to their playerbase oh wait no they dont and it takes them years to fix even the smallest things.
Its not like removing local in 0.0 has huge support. Akita is probably just trying to get some reactions.
|
Shawna Gray
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 22:27:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Shawna Gray on 15/08/2010 22:27:19
Originally by: Akita T
Edited by: Akita T on 15/08/2010 22:19:43
Originally by: Shawna Gray
Originally by: Gneeznow
I'm sure it'll happen CCP always listen to their playerbase oh wait no they dont and it takes them years to fix even the smallest things.
Its not like removing local in 0.0 has huge support. Akita is probably just trying to get some reactions.
[sarcasm]Oh yeah, it doesn't have any support whatsoever indeed. That's why it's NOT on the list of issues raised by any of the CSMs to CCP, ever.[/sarcasm]
U mad?
Yes a few forum *****s does not mean a lot of support. Even on those proposals there are usually exceptions like keeping local if you got sov.
|
Shawna Gray
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 22:31:00 -
[6]
Originally by: sentinel22uk
You're completely contradicting yourself there Shawna 
Explain please.
|
Shawna Gray
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 22:43:00 -
[7]
Originally by: sentinel22uk
Every ship already has a cloak fitted ?
At least now you can sneak up on them and get a kill ?
And thats why cloaks will be nerfed at the same time as local or soon after.
|
Shawna Gray
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.16 05:26:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Shawna Gray on 16/08/2010 05:29:21
Originally by: Akita T
Because monolithic power blocs with huge financial strength and great manpower (held under control by the promise of financial security) is also oh-so-good for the game, right ?
Lol like thats going to change by removing local.
Quote:
Because CCP never, ever stated that they want to make PvP and warfare in general more fluid and more attractive for smaller gangs ? And because CCP POSITIVELY LOVES huge blobs and node crashes so much they would NEVER EVER do anything to break'em down ?
Lol like thats going to change by removing local.
Good troll.
|
Shawna Gray
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.16 23:10:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Intigo
Edited by: Intigo on 16/08/2010 22:39:14
Delayed local = everyone farming anomalies in 0.0 now would go back to hisec and farm missions. 0.0 is deserted in terms of carebear work.
Yay?
...
Yes then we can all sit in cloaked ships all day and scan for targets and complain about too few people in 0.0 while carebearing in empire on our alts.
|
Shawna Gray
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.17 21:08:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Razin
[
I disagree that safety and reliable intel are required for æother players to playÆ. If that were true youÆd be able to see whatÆs on the other side of the stargate before jumping. To do that you need a scout. Do you think the fact that you need a scout to see what youÆre jumping into prevents some people from playing?
There is a massive difference between using a scout for a extremely limited time while traveling, and have more or less permanent scouts in a system.
My guess is that corps/alliances insted will rely on bots for their intel.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|